Designed for
UI/UX, web, and product copy
Produces microcopy variants tailored to component constraints and product channels
Content rewriter generator for software & web design
Rewrite UI microcopy that fits component limits and accessibility
Generate short, polished variants for buttons, notifications, tooltips, and hero text with designer-focused constraints: character limits, ARIA-friendly labels, UK/US tone swaps, and ready-to-paste handoff notes.
Handoff formats
Figma notes, developer snippet
Includes labeled variants and short implementation notes for tickets
Localization-aware
US/UK tone variants
Side-by-side adaptions with spelling and tone notes
Design problems we solve
Why designers choose a component-aware rewriter
Designers and product teams need microcopy that fits strict UI constraints, reads clearly across channels, and remains accessible. This rewriter is built around common design workflows so you can produce short, correct, and handoff-ready text without repeated manual edits.
- Fix inconsistent tone across UI components and marketing pages without rewriting from scratch
- Shorten copy to meet strict character limits for buttons, inputs, and labels
- Produce ARIA-friendly labels and alt text alongside visible copy to improve accessibility
- Create channel-specific variants (modal vs page vs tooltip) with one prompt
Practical by design
How it works — designer-first prompts and outputs
Use preset prompt clusters tuned to common design constraints. Provide component context (max characters, container type, and usage) and receive multiple labeled variants with short notes for implementation.
- Input: component type, max length, visible copy, and tone
- Output: 2–4 labeled variants, an accessibility aria-label, and a 1-line handoff note
- Optional: UK/US tone swap and short localization notes
CTA variant generator
Rewrite a primary CTA for a SaaS signup button, keeping length under 28 characters and offering professional, friendly, and experimental options.
- Button text (3 tone options)
- One-line usage note for each variant
Shorten modal confirmations
Trim a confirmation to 140 characters while preserving the action and providing a 2-word secondary label.
- Short copy for the modal
- Secondary label (2 words)
Accessible label and ARIA
Generate visible copy plus a concise aria-label that adds screen-reader context and keeps the visual text short.
- Visible label
- aria-label for screen readers
Ready-made prompt templates
Prompt clusters you can paste
Use these copy-and-paste prompts in your workflow (Figma plugin, Notion spec, or command-line tool) to get consistent, production-ready variants.
- Rewrite CTA variants: "Rewrite this primary CTA for a SaaS signup flow. Keep length under 28 characters for a button, maintain urgency without exclamation marks, and produce three tone options: professional, friendly, and experimental. Provide the button text and one-line microcopy explaining when to use each variant."
- Shorten microcopy to fit constraints: "Shorten this modal confirmation to 140 characters while preserving the action (delete project) and including a clear secondary action label. Output: short copy; 2-word secondary label."
- Accessibility labeling and ARIA: "Generate accessible label alternatives for this button copy and produce an aria-label suitable for screen readers that adds context not shown visually. Keep the aria-label concise and descriptive."
- Localization tone swap (US <> UK): "Adapt this onboarding welcome message from US English to UK English with a polite tone and British spelling. Produce side-by-side comparisons and note key spelling changes."
Fits design and delivery tooling
Integrations and handoff-ready formats
Export labeled variants and brief implementation notes you can paste into Figma text layers, GitHub/GitLab PRs, Notion or Confluence docs, and developer tickets in Jira or Linear. Each output includes which component prop to replace and a one-line note about truncation behavior.
- Figma: paste variant labels and handoff notes into layer comments or tokens
- Docs & tickets: copy preformatted developer snippets with prop keys and variants
- Content platforms: provide meta-friendly descriptions and CMS-ready fields
FAQ
How can I keep microcopy consistent across a large design system?
Start with a single source: export the system’s current labels and pass them through a 'consistency' prompt that normalizes tone and capitalization (for example, sentence case). Save the resulting variants as tokens in your design system and add a short rationale note for each change so designers and devs understand why the edit improves clarity or accessibility.
What techniques ensure rewritten copy fits strict character limits?
Provide the exact max character count and the container type (button, input, badge) in the prompt. Ask for the visible copy plus a shorter fallback (truncated on small screens) and a one-line note about expected truncation behavior. Use the 'shorten' prompt cluster to get versions that preserve action words and critical nouns.
How do I validate that rewritten labels remain accessible for screen readers?
Generate an aria-label alongside every visible label and include context that screen readers need (for example, the target of the action). Then run the outputs through accessibility linting or a quick manual check: read the aria-label aloud, ensure it’s descriptive without redundancy, and confirm it doesn’t exceed recommended length for assistive tech.
What's the best way to produce channel-specific variants (modal vs page vs tooltip)?
Provide the intended channel and its constraints in a single prompt and request labeled outputs (e.g., 'Modal — 140 chars', 'Tooltip — 15 words', 'Hero — 20–30 words'). Keep technical terms consistent and ask the generator to flag ambiguous nouns that may need in-product context or icons.
How to manage British vs American English tone changes without multiple manual passes?
Use the localization tone-swap prompt: feed the US version and ask for a UK adaptation that notes key spelling and phrasing differences. Keep the request explicit about formal vs conversational tone and whether to update currency, date formats, and certain idioms.
Can I use the generator for both marketing copy and in-app microcopy safely?
Yes, but prompt for the specific channel. Marketing copy can be longer and more persuasive; in-app microcopy should be concise and prescriptive. Request channel-labeled variants and implementation notes to avoid accidentally pasting a marketing-length blurb into a 28-character button.
How should designers incorporate human review into automated rewrites?
Treat generator outputs as draft suggestions. Assign a reviewer (UX writer or designer) to validate tone, accessibility, and product context. Keep an editable changelog entry with rationale for each accepted variant so future editors understand the decision.
What’s an efficient handoff format to give developers exact text variants and context?
Provide a short preformatted snippet that lists: component name, prop key, default text, error text, success text, and a one-line note for truncation or responsive behavior. Paste that into a PR description or ticket so developers can replace props without ambiguity.
Related pages
- PricingCompare plans and designer-focused presets.
- Feature comparisonSee how designer-first rewriting fits into your toolchain.
- BlogRead best practices for microcopy and accessibility.
- About TextaLearn how Texta approaches designer-friendly AI tooling.